How to Audit Your Existing Documentation — A Step-by-Step Guide

If your documentation feels like a file cabinet, dusty, slightly chaotic, and occasionally on fire ... you’re not alone.

Auditing documentation is the best way to turn that mess into something useful. This guide walks you through a clear, repeatable audit process so you can find the gaps, prioritize fixes, and get work done.

Why audit at all?

• Reduce support calls and rework.

• Improve onboarding speed.

• Ensure compliance and reduce risk.

• Make content discoverable, reusable, and maintainable.

Plus: auditing gives you the facts to argue for resources (and to stop the “We’ve always done it this way” excuses).

🛑 Before you start → what you’ll need

• A project owner (Documentation Lead, Product Owner, or Contract Technical Writer).

• 1–3 auditors (smaller shops: same person can act as auditor + SME).

• Access to all doc sources (SharePoint, Confluence, Git, Google Drive, PDFs).

• A simple tracking tool: spreadsheet, Airtable, or a ticketing board.

• Time: plan for a quick audit (2–5 days) for a small product, full audit (2–6 weeks) for medium catalogs, large orgs may need 2–3 months.

  
  

---

Step 1 — Define scope & success criteria

1. Choose scope: one product, one department, one content type (SOPs, user guides, API docs).

2. Define goals: accuracy, findability, compliance, consistency, outdated content removal, or migration readiness.

3. Agree on success metrics: % of pages needing work, average age of docs, search success rate, reduction in support tickets.

Deliverable: Scope & Success Criteria doc (1 page)

Step 2 — Build an inventory (the content map)

1. Export or list every file/page: Title, Location/URL, Owner, Last modified date, File type, Audience, Status (published/draft/archived).

2. Use automated crawlers for websites or Confluence exports if you can. For drives, export folder trees.

3. Capture sample size if full inventory is huge (e.g., “random 10% + all top-traffic pages”).

Deliverable: Inventory spreadsheet (master list)

Step 3 — Triage: quick pass to categorize content

• Good: accurate, complete, and findable

• Needs update: mostly fine, just edits/screenshots/versions

• Needs rewrite: structure, tone, or wrong audience

• Remove/archive: deprecated, duplicate, or obsolete

• Missing: processes/flows that should exist but don’t

Deliverable: Inventory with triage flag column

Step 4 — Establish a scoring rubric (quality checklist)

✔️ Suggested checklist (score each item 0–2):

• Accuracy: factual & up to date

• Completeness: all steps/fields covered

• Clarity: plain language, no jargon overload

• Structure: headings, steps, procedures, visuals

• Usability: searchability, TOC, internal links

• Accessibility: alt text, readable fonts, color contrast

• Visuals: clear screenshots/diagrams, labeled properly

• Compliance/Legal: required disclaimers or regulated wording

• Ownership: has clear owner & review date

✔️ Calculate a total % score and define thresholds:

• 85–100% = Good

• 60–84% = Needs update

• <60% = Needs rewrite

Deliverable: Scoring template (spreadsheet column formulas)

Step 5 — Do the audit (review content)

1. Assign content to reviewers and set deadlines.

2. Reviewers open the content, score per rubric, add comments, and suggest fixes.

3. Capture time spent — this helps with quoting future work.

Tip: Keep teams small. Two independent reviewers for important docs helps (one SME, one writer).

Deliverable: Completed scores + reviewer notes

Step 6 — Prioritize fixes (impact vs effort)

Use a simple matrix:

• High impact / Low effort = Do first

• High impact / High effort = Plan in next sprint or project

• Low impact / Low effort = Quick wins; batch them

• Low impact / High effort = Archive or defer

Deliverable: Prioritized action list (task board or spreadsheet)

Step 7 — Plan the remediation work

1. Create tasks with owners, acceptance criteria, estimated hours.

2. Group by type: quick edits, rewrite, restructure, translate, migration.

3. Decide delivery method: in-house, contractor, or hybrid.

4. If content migration is involved, test a pilot page first.

Deliverable: Remediation roadmap + resource plan

Step 8 — Update governance & prevent future rot

• Content owners assigned by page or product.

• Review cadence: quarterly for critical, annually otherwise.

• Style guide + templates (single source of truth).

• Version control + change logs.

• Onboarding checklist: new hires must know where docs live.

• Metrics dashboard: search success, page views, helpdesk tickets.

Deliverable: Documentation governance playbook (1–2 pages)

Step 9 — Execute fixes & QA

1. Track progress in a ticketing tool.

2. For rewrites, do peer review + SME sign-off.

3. Run usability checks: give revised docs to a fresh user and observe task completion.

4. Publish with version notes and review dates.

Deliverable: Updated documentation + QA signoffs

Step 10 — Measure results & iterate

• Reduction in support tickets for documented tasks (% change)

• Search clickthrough & time-to-first-finding

• Percentage of docs at each quality band

• Onboarding time for new hires

• Time spent by SMEs answering repetitive questions

Deliverable: Audit final report + KPI dashboard

---

Practical templates & quick checklists (copy/paste)

Inventory columns (minimum)

ID | Title | URL/Path | Owner | Audience | File Type | Last Modified | Status | Triage Tag | Score | Reviewer Notes

Quality checklist (0–2 scoring)

Accuracy | Completeness | Clarity | Structure | Usability | Visuals | Accessibility | Compliance | Ownership

Prioritization tags

P1: Critical (legal/compliance/launch) | P2: Important (high usage) | P3: Nice-to-have | P4: Archive

Typical timeline (example)

• Small product (20–50 docs): Inventory + quick audit → 3–7 days; Remediation → 1–3 weeks

• Medium catalog (100–300 docs): Inventory + audit → 2–4 weeks; Remediation → 1–3 months

• Large org (500+ docs): Phased approach, pilot 2–4 weeks; full program 3–6 months

Sample one-page executive summary (use in your email or deck)

• Scope: 120 pages (API + user guides)

• Findings: 40% need updates, 15% need rewrite, 10% deprecated

• Risks: Outdated API examples causing integration failures; missing SOPs for audit

• Recommendation: Immediate sprint for top 15 P1 pages (estimated 120 hours), ongoing monthly maintenance (10 hours/month)

Common gotchas (and how to avoid them)

• No owner assigned → Assign owners before audit.

• Scope creep → Stick to initial scope; run phased audits.

• SME time shortage → Use recorded interviews and shadow sessions to capture knowledge.

• Over-optimistic timelines → Add buffer and track actual hours; audits always take longer than expected.

Final tips — make it sustainable

• Start small and show results quickly (quick wins build credibility).

• Use the audit to get buy-in for ongoing documentation investment.

• Automate what you can (search analytics, link checks).

• Treat documentation as a product with owners, a roadmap, and a backlog.